Talk:Emergent materialism

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Religion / Mind Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of religion
	Philosophy of mind

I recall a witty quote I read somewhere long ago. "If human beings were so simple that we could understand them, we would be so simple that we couldn't". Anyone know who to attribute that to? --BradBeattie 22:41, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't." -Emerson M. Pugh. Oh google, we love you so. --BradBeattie 22:44, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Needs "translating" so that non-philosophers can understand it all

This page could do with some attention from someone with a good knowledge of philosophy and the ability to translate it into language an intelligent person without philosophical training can understand! I'm a psychologist with a reasonable but basic knowledge of philosophy and I'm really not sure what "an ontological simple" is, for example (although I am familiar with the concept of ontology). A quick google didn't enlighten me much, I found the phrase being used but only in contexts that were no clearer than this wikipedia entry. All I could establish was that it was not a grammatical error (which was my first thought, as I assumed the author meant "ontologically simple"); I can't find a definition at all (although I didn't spend too long looking as I'm supposed to be doing something else). missdipsy (talk) 17:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additions and Revisions

While editing this, I added names for clarity and references. Philosopher names are heard everywhere so adding this might help someone make connections to other theories and people. I also added a breakdown section and an objections section. The breakdown section is essentially for defining term and making it more inclusive for non-philosophers. A previous comment stated that there were a couple terms that they didn't understand and aren't common if you aren't studying or will informed about philosophy so I added this section to provide more clarity and information. Something else I added was an objections section. Every philosophical theory has at least one objection or a person who rejects it. For people looking for a quick info session about emergent materialism, I feel that this is really helpful in understanding the theory as a whole. Strawberry kiwix (talk) 22:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Ynnz (talk) 02:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]