Jump to content

Talk:Louis XVIII

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleLouis XVIII was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 7, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 16, 2019, September 5, 2023, and September 5, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article

Images

[edit]

Do you think we should make the images of Louis XV, Louis XVI, Louis XVIII, and Charles X them in normal attire instead there coronation robes? Just a question--Orson1234 (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2021

Additional Film Portrayal

[edit]

Proposal to add Louis XVIII's portrayal by English actor Ian McNeice in Napoleon (2023 film) as another notable mention in the Film and Television section Revarcline (talk) 04:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2024

[edit]
71.162.137.96 (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Louis-Antoine and Marie-Thérèse did consummate their marriage 13 years after their wedding in a letter. By December, Marie-Thérèse fell pregnant and a letter from Dr. Lefebvre, Marie Therese’s doctor, explaining why the couple was so happy. Hue told his wife that the Duke of Angoulême would be a father in June. Marie-Thérèse would later miscarry her baby, but since the pregnancy was more than 20 weeks along, the baby would be considered stillborn. Marie-Thérèse then went to bath to recover from her pregnancy/childbirth.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 00:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality

[edit]

Since it has been awhile since the last assessment, I have had another look at the current version and noticed uncited statements. Should this article be posted at WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs and the entire "Film and television" section. Unresolved "citation needed" tags since June 2024. Z1720 (talk) 13:37, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree OrangeLolipopSnail (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the film and television section as unsourced & trivial (as most such sections are). There are still 6 CN tags, though. Hog Farm talk 01:15, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.